Leave a Reply

6,842 thoughts on “Greatest Warrior of All Time

  1. sachin,

    Did jarashandha ever challenege for Krishna and Balarama for a one to one duel .

    why he needed such an big ally to kill some teenagers. remember when Jarashandha attacked Mathura, pandavas were living their in the woods.

    would any king take such a big force to kill pandavas when they were living in the woods?

    Now are you blaming Krishna for building a fortress?

    Krishna presented himself before Jarashandha, but Jarashandha chose bhimsen.

    Now how come Krishna is to be blamed here?

    even for a moment think Krishna was not god.

    how it would appear Jarashandha fighting with 15 – 16 year old bhimsen. and proving his might?

    where was his sense that time?

    Krishna dragged Arjuna, one mightiest men of that time . if krishna was weak , then what about arjuna?

    If Krishna is weaker than Jarashandha , Arjuna was definitely no where near Karna.

    it proves Karna was fighting better warrior in Bhimsen,

    as i have already proved how satyaki had a sudden change of performance just by changing chariots.

  2. @ Niraj,

    Your statement-”Shakuni also ran away that didn’t stop sahadeva from killing him jayadratha ran away still that didn’t stop bhim from teaching him a lesson and arjuna from killing him.”

    My ans- So want to say that whoever succeeds in running away should be considered as the winner ??? Ha..ha…ha…ha…. That is why you had claimed previoulsy that Karna running away from Gandharvas was a victory for Karna… Isnt it Niraj ??? Ha..ha…ha…ha…. What an arguement… You have lost you mind completely Niraj & you have gone down to the level of Smarty/Sanjay/Rocky in terms of understanding…. Ha..ha…ha…ha….

    You should be carefull in what you claim here because you know your mockery will be made because of your funny claims for a long time……

    Your statement-”If you have vendetta you will hunt the person till the depths and if you have the guts and that person is in front of you You will definitely jump on him So stop crying foul your self.”

    My ans- Who told you that Jarasandh had Vowed to kill Krishna ????? Jarasandh had already taken the revenge of Kansa’s death by capturing Mathura from Krishna…..

    Your statement-”Dawood murders people runs away and if some brave person catches him or gets chance to challange him he wont be discouraged by bhagoda dawood he will leap to the oppurtinity. So your example is nullified completely.”

    My ans- Non-contextual example….. By this logic every Indian whose relative was killed by Dawood should go to Pakistan & should challenge him for a fight to kill him…. But how many actually went to Pakistan…?? Do you know anyone ?? Even Indian Military didnt attack Pak to get Dawood, so does it make India(Jarasandh) weaker than Dawood(Krishna) ???? Rubbish logic….

    OK Niraj, since the list of you illogical reasonings are increasing day by day, so let me ask you one question & let me check what your logic says about this : “If Jarasandh had killed Bhima in that wrestling fight, then what do you think What could Jarasadh have done with Krishna/Arjun after this ????”

    Be carefull in answering this question & dont give funny/illogical answer, otherwise mockery of it will be made in this blog…..

    Awaiting your reply…..

  3. Yuddhisthir thinks that karna was as strong as bhim

    I too blieve so.

    When bhim hit him with the bow, he didn’t even flinch. Defeated Jarasandh in wrestling easily

    That hero who had the STRENGTH OF TEN THOUSAND ELEPHANTS , who in this world was an unrivalled car-warrior, who was possessed of leonine pride and gait, who was endued with great intelligence and compassion, whose liberality was very great, who practised many high vows, who was the refuge of the Dhartarashtras, who was sensitive about his honour, whose prowess was irresistible, who was read

    1. i think Karna had the strength of 10,000 Indian elephants and Bhima had the strength of 10,000 african elephants.

      who were the strongest man of that time.

      Balram, Bhima, Jarashandha, Vaka, Himdiva, Karna, Kichaka, Duryodhana, shalya.

      among these we have very few Idea about Balarama , Jarashandha .

      and none of the known strongman descended out of the chariot that many times.

      so bhimsen had the strength advantage than others .

      but how much, he is shown crushing chariots , stomping people ,

      on the contrary he didn’t do any such things against Karna.

      he ran for cover , and didn’t show such audacity before him.

      Karna was very tall and broad as said by Krishna .

      Bhimsen mace was 1.5 times heavier than duryo.

      and read the fight with kichaka, Kichaka too summer slammed bhimsen.

      i think bhimsen was 1.5 times stronger than duryo and karna.

      but he didn’t enjoy that much strength advantage otherwise Karna would never abuse him from so close.

      would you abuse and criticize Big show from such close proximity or even Stone cold.

      i am giving WWE example since you are THE ROCK.

      Can you DIG IT suckerrrrrrrrrRRRRR————r –r -rr–rrr -rrrrr uhhuh —uhhuhhh ——gh———– a——h-ah ——–.

  4. Sisupala said:

    If, O Bharata, it was your wish to offer the first worship unto the slayer of Madhu, why were these monarchs brought here to be insulted thus? We have not paid tributes to the illustrious son of Kunti from fear, from desire of gain, or from having been won over by conciliation. On the other hand, we have paid him tribute simply because he hath been desirous of the imperial dignity from motives of virtue. And yet he it is that thus insulteth us.

    Indeed, the reputation for virtue that the son of Dharma hath acquired, hath been acquired by him without cause, for who would offer such undue worship unto one that hath fallen off from virtue.

    “Sisupala said,–”That mighty king Jarasandha who desired not to fight with Krishna, saying ‘He is a slave,’ was worthy of my greatest esteem. Who will regard as praiseworthy the act which was done by Kesava, as also by Bhima and Arjuna, in the matter of Jarasandha’s death?

    i have no doubt that Sisupala would have been defeated by Bhima if opposed,

    but he didn’t offer tributes becs of fear like many kingdom.

    anyone want to challenge this?

    secondly they paid tribute to Yudi and not to Krishna. but when they found out the picture is different from the promos they made objection and loud protest.

  5. Guys read this carefully,

    satyaki too was present so was bhimsen but they couldn’t do too much against Karna.

    It was Arjuna who killed the innocent horses and weaponless charioteer of karna.

    ha ha ha ha

    quality of resources speaks here?

    Having caused an immense slaughter in thy army, the mighty and invincible Dhananjaya, of prowess incapable of being baffled came upon the ruler of the Sindhus. Karna, however, O king, with his arrows, resisted him in that battle in the very sight, O Bharata, of Bhimasena and Satwata. The mighty-armed Partha, in the very sight of all the troops, pierced the Suta’s son, in return, with ten arrows, on the field of battle. Then Satwata, O sire, pierced Karna with three arrows. And Bhimasena pierced him with three arrows, and Partha himself, once more, with seven. The mighty car-warrior, Karna, then pierced each of those three warriors with sixty arrows. AND THUS, O KING, RAGED THAT BATTLE BETWEEN KARNA ALONE (ON ONE SIDE) AND THE MANY (ON THE OTHER)

    THE PROWESS, O SIRE, THAT WE THEN BEHELD OF THE SUTA’S SON WAS WONDERFUL IN THE EXTREME, SINCE, EXCITED WITH WRATH IN BATTLE, HE SINGLY RESISTED THOSE THREE GREAT CAR-WARRIORS. Then the mighty-armed Phalguna, in that battle, pierced Karna, the son of Vikartana, in all his limbs with a hundred arrows. All his limbs bathed in blood, the Suta’s son of great prowess and bravery, pierced Phalguna in return with fifty arrows. Beholding that lightness of hand displayed by him in battle, Arjuna brooked it not. Cutting off his bow, that hero, viz., Dhananjaya, the son of Pritha, quickly pierced Karna in the centre of the chest with nine arrows, Then Dhananjaya, with great speed at a time, when speed was necessary shot in that battle a shaft of solar effulgence for the destruction of Karna. Drona’s son, however, with a crescent-shaped arrow, cut off that shaft as it coursed impetuously (towards Karna). Thus cut off by
    p. 317
    [paragraph continues] Aswatthaman, that shaft fell down on the earth. Endued with great prowess, the Suta’s son, then, O king, took up another bow, and covered the son of Pandu with several thousands of arrows. Partha, however, like the wind dispersing flight of locusts, dispelled with his own arrows that extraordinary shower of arrows issuing out of Karna’s bow. Then Arjuna, displaying his lightness of hands, covered Karna, in that battle, with his arrows, in the very sight of all thy troops. Karna also, that slayer of hosts, desirous of counteracting Arjuna’s feat, covered Arjuna with several thousands of arrows. Roaring at each other like two bulls, those lions among men, those mighty car-warriors, shrouded the welkin with clouds of straight shafts. Each rendered invisible by the other’s arrowy showers, they continued to strike each other. And they roared at each other and pierced each other with their wordy darts, saying, ‘I am Partha, wait’–or, ‘I am Karna, wait’, O Phalguna! Indeed these two heroes fought with each other wonderfully, displaying great activity and skill. And the sight they presented was such that other warriors became witnesses of that battle. And applauded by Siddhas, Charnas and Pannagas, they fought with each other, O king, each desirous of slaying the other. Then Duryodhana, O king addressing thy warriors, said, ‘Carefully protect the son of Radha! Without slaying Arjuna he would not abstain from battle. Even this is what Vrisha told me.’ Meanwhile, O monarch, beholding the prowess of Karna, Arjuna, of white steeds, with four shafts shot from the bow-string drawn to the ear, despatched the four steeds of Karna to Yama’s domain. And he also felled with a broad-headed arrow, Karna’s charioteer from his niche in the car. And he covered Karna himself with clouds of shafts in the very sight of thy son. Thus shrouded with arrows the steedless and driverless Karna, stupefied by that arrowy shower, knew not what to do. BEHOLDING HIM MADE CARLESS, ASWATTHAMAN, O KING, CAUSED HIM TO RIDE ON HIS CAR, AND CONTINUED TO FIGHT WITH ARJUNA.

    most important point Karna continued fighting with Arjuna. Fight similar to Draupadi swayamavara but that time no chariot and charioteer had any role.

    Next,

    this was the same satyaki who without doubt was a great warrior ( he had shown his skill by breaking 100 plus bows of Drona)

    got defeated by Bhurisravas and was finding hard to make his presence felt against Karna here.

    Did this, just after change of chariot (point to be noted) Satayki already had a chariot ,it is evident from his fight here.

    but Satyaki was granted the special chariot of Krishna especially for a purpose.

    In this group also , karna was the one who gave some kind of resistance , I mean some kind of (nothing much to talked about) but what happen to the others?

    Karna, casting angry glances on the grandson of Sini in that battle, and as if burning him therewith, rushed at him furiously again and again, O Chastiser of foes! Beholding him filled with rage, Satyaki pierced him in return, shooting dense showers of arrows, like an elephant piercing (with his tusks) a rival elephant. Those two tigers among men, endued with the activity of tigers and possessed of incomparable prowess, mangled each other furiously in that battle. The grandson of Sini, then, with shafts made entirely of iron, repeatedly pierced Karna, that chastiser of foes, in all his limbs. And he also felled, with a broad-headed arrow, the charioteer of Karna from his niche in the car. And with his keen shafts, he slew the four steeds, white in hue, of Adhiratha’s son. And then cutting into a hundred fragments the standard of Karna with a hundred arrows, that bull among men made Karna carless in the very sight of thy son.

    Then all thy warriors, O king, became cheerless. Then Vrishasena, the son of Karna, and Salya, the ruler of the Madras, and Drona’s son, encompassed the grandson of Sini from all sides. Then a confusion set in, and nothing could be seen. Indeed, when the heroic Karna was made carless by Satyaki, cries of Oh and Alas arose, among all thy troops. Karna also, O king, pierced by Satwata with his arrows and exceedingly weakened ascended the car of Duryodhana, sighing deeply, remembering his friendship for thy son from his childhood and having striven to realise the promise he had made about the bestowal of sovereignty on Duryodhana. After Karna hath been made carless, thy brave sons, headed by Duhsasana, O king, were not slain by the self-restrained Satyaki because the latter wished not to falsify the vow made by Bhimasena. Desirous also of not falsifying the vow formerly made by Partha (about the slaughter of Karna), Satyaki simply made those warriors carless and weakened them exceedingly, but did not deprive them of life. It is Bhima that hath vowed the slaughter of thy sons, and it is Partha that, at the time of the second match at dice, vowed the slaughter of Karna. Although all those warriors headed by Karna made strong efforts for slaying Satyaki, yet those foremost of car-warriors, failed to slay him. Drona’s son and Kritavarman and other mighty car-warriors, as also hundreds of foremost Kshatriyas, were all vanquished by Satyaki with only one bow. That hero fought, desirous of benefiting king Yudhishthira the Just, and of attaining to heaven. Indeed, Satyaki, that crusher of foes, is equal to either of the two Krishnas in energy. Smiling the while, he vanquished all thy troops, O best of men! In this world, there are only three mighty bowmen, viz., Krishna, Partha, and Satyaki. There is no fourth to be seen
    THIS PERFORMANCE OF SATYAKI WAS EVEN BETTER THAN ARJUNA FEATS OF VIRAT WAR.
    DOES ANYONE WANT TO CHALLENGE THIS?

    quality of chariot speaks here.

  6. guys, who took the vow of killing Shri Krishna?

    Jarasandha.

    if Shalva can have the determination to kill Shri Krishna. if shalva had the courage to attack Dwarika.

    why Jarashandha didn’t have that?

    who took the vow ,Jarashandha .

    if Sisupala can dare to attack dwarika , why couldn’t Jarashandha do the same ?

    and when Krishna presented himself before Jarashandha ,Uski Hawa nikal gayi.

    now only a scientific mind trapped inside the body of SUPPANDI can explain these mysteries?

    similarly only a scientific mind trapped inside the body of SUPPANDI can ignore that Krishna protected every citizen of Mathura by building a safe fortress at Dwarika.

    , O Monarch, the king of Magadha, saying,–O slayer of all foes, kill thou the slayer of my husband.–Then, O great king, remembering the conclusion to which we had come of old we became exceedingly cheerless and fled from Mathura. Dividing our large wealth into small portions so as to make each portion easily portable, we fled from fear of Jarasandha, with our cousins and relatives. Reflecting upon everything, we fled towards the west. There is a delightful town towards the west called Kusasthali, adorned by the mountains of Raivata. In that city, O monarch, we took up our abode. We rebuilt its fort and made it so strong that it has become impregnable even to the Gods. And from within it even the women might fight the foe, what to speak of the Yadava heroes without fear of any kind? O slayer of all foes, we are now living in that city. And, O tiger of the Kuru race, considering the inaccessibility of that first of mountains and regarding themselves as having already crossed the fear of Jarasandha, the descendants of Madhu have become exceedingly glad. Thus, O king, though possessed of strength and energy, yet from the oppressions of Jarasandha we have been obliged to repair to the mountains of Gomanta, measuring three Yojanas in length. Within each yojana have been established one and twenty posts of armed men. And at intervals of each yojana are hundred gates with arches which are defended by valourous heroes engaged in guarding them. And innumerable Kshatriyas invincible in war, belonging to the eighteen younger branches of the Yadavas, are employed in defending these works. In our race, O king, there are full eighteen thousand brothers and cousins. Ahuka hath had a hundred sons, each of

    p. 35

    whom is almost like a god (in prowess), Charudeshna with his brother Chakradeva, Satyaki, myself, Valadeva the son of Rohini, and my son Samva who is equal unto me in battle–these seven, O king are Atirathas. Besides these, there are others, O king, whom I shall presently name. They are Kritavarman, Anadhrishti, Samika, Samitinjaya, Kanka, Sanku and Kunti. These seven are Maharathas.

    now again , scientific mind trapped inside the body of SUPPANDI

    can ignore that pandavas felt insulted when some kings laugh at them for worshiping Shri Krishna.

    they felt insulted becs they were laughing at their boss Krishna.

  7. Note it is bhim who is talked about here
    Frequently jumping up or rushing on all sides, that hero endued with great activity, wandering along many routes, caused the combatants to be amazed. And some he slew by his legs, and DRAGGING down others he pressed them down under the earth

    Karna was exempted from the privilege of being dragged by bhim.

    Reason unknown.

  8. Dear Sachin

    #-HAWA-MAHAL FACT ?? Ha..ha…ha…ha…. I did not see such fact in Vyas MB…. Can you do me the honour to show me those facts from Vyas MB ?????

    The Rock says – karna needing duryodhan permission is itself proof

    U hv yet to provide proof for your claim

    #– By this logic, Karna was definitly defeated by Bhima at Rajsuya Yagya, because during 14th day, Karna hide inside his car like a mouse due to fear of Bhima…. Ha..ha…ha…ha…. what a childish logic of disscussion…..
    The Rock says – if a scientific mind cant comprehend that it was a dodging move then clearly that scientific mind follows cartoon science

    By the way I asked for proof of 8-0 of bhim vs karna. Where is it?

    #-Your statement-”The Rock says – He needed duryodhan’s permission otherwise he would hv been pulling a Shishupal type of stunt in the ceremony”

    My ans- Nice HAWA-MAHAL claim from Rocky-Puraan….
    The Rock says -No reason given. Why is it hawa mahAl or why is not one of your haha-and-Huhu mahal’s resident

    #-Childish arguement again…. Who told you that the Kansa was the same Kansa who was killed by Krishna ??? Actually it was just a printing mistake….

    The Rock says – did u see readers?

    He says this statement. With the same ease his scientific giggles come out.

    However he will deny the statement if is applied for karna.

    We hv no proof for karna being defeated.

    If u hv show us

    Your statement-”The Rock says -a simple logic is that a winner doesn’t wet his pants by. Mere mention of his victim.”

    My ans- HAWA-MAHAL claim…. Prove that Bhima wetted his pant there ……

    The Rock says – niraj bhai u r right.

    If a point has been proven umpteen times, he wil stil ask for it as if we are going on a merry go round

    If we provide the proof yet again

    He wil let it go and ask for it again.

    Yeh chal kya raha hai yahan par?

    #- Tarak mehta ka ooltah chashma doesnt mean defeat for Bhima, so stop crying…..
    The Rock says -similarly being made chariotless is not defeat so stop giggling

    #– Bhills attacked from behind…..

    The Rock says – Sachin, I very much want to laugh seeing Your scientific answer
    “Bhills attacked from behind ”
    Lol..

    Prove it from kmg or dont talk in air..
    #-Your statement-”u seriously need to think Wat u type. Arjun seeing them had smiled. In a surprise attack who smiles? Hence surprise attack thing is punctured”

    My ans- Wow… what a childish HAWA-MAHAL logic ?? But your childish logic doesnt prove this….

    The Rock says – again no reason given, y is it hawamahal or why is it not a resident of your haha and Huhu mahal

    My ans- Same childish questions again…. Let me reply you in your own tone… Bhishma/Drona/Karna were warriors wasn’t they? And so called great warriors too. Wat was their job if not to fight? Bhima killed 100 Kauravas in Kurukshetra, & hBhishma/Drona/Karna couldnt stop Bhima. Bhima’s job done….. So Bhima vs Bhishma+Drona+Karna = 100 : 0 ….. Isnt it Rocky ????????

    The Rock says – the least we can expect from trained warriors is tht they wouldn’t die with a single arrow shot

    Other warriors required at least 20

    Another thing we can expect from a trained warrior is that he would be able to fight some junior artists starring in a dhoom 3 like movie

  9. I hvnt been following the blog for the past 2 days as keenly as I should

    Bt now that I m back and hv gone through the posts, then let me express my amusement in an unscientific manner

    Hahahahaha

    I had been wondering when would we get back to krishna jarasandh,

    And Here we are yet again

    Sachin it was u who said that “a kings first duty is to protect its citizens ”

    I concur

    So do u

    So does krishna

    What’s the fuss about?

    U rated Vajra as one of the most destructive weapon

    Well a worthles Warrior like krishna had it. King kmg the jst himself said so

    What is a weapon like vajra doing with krishna?

    You wouldn’t exactly think arjun to be a weakling. Am I right?

    Well he was dragged by krishna, even when arjun was applying his full strength

    jarasandh didn’t choose krishna. Jarasandh knew who he would be up against

  10. @Sachin,

    You could only respond to 6 out of 9 points I dished out for your scientific & ENGLISH mind. In 4 out of those 6 you gave HA…HA….HA..HA…HAA….HA…HA…HA…HA…HA….HA….HA..HA…….HA……….HA…..HAA…and HAWA MAHAL. Even STATISTICALLY YOU PROVED YOUR DUMBNESS.
    Balance 2 you repeated your meaningless ENGLISH banter as usual…….
    You are not worth even putting your point across!!
    ——————————————————
    To put your dumbness on records –
    1. My statement-”Did Jarasandh chose Krishna for duel inspite of hunting for him??”
    Your ans- Yes, Jarasandh indeed did, when he attacked Mathura BUT… B…U….T…..the great krishna RAN AWAY from that challenge…. Ha..ha…ha…ha…..

    Dumbness personified – By the time Krishna offered himself for fight with him, Jarasandh had greyed his hair in his search. At least keep a track of chronological order of events…Attacking a kingdom is NOT CALLED INVITE FOR DUEL!!!!!!!!
    ————————————————-
    Your statement –“Bhima challenged Karna for wrestling match to kill him, because by that time Bhima had decided to kill Karna” nullifies your own hallucination that Bhima did not kill Karna due to Arjun’s vow. Even if he decided to kill then what stopped him from doing so?

    Another opportunity for you to go HA….HA….HA….HA……HA…..HA…..HA….HAWA MAHAL!!!

  11. Sachin Dawood murders people runs away and if some brave person catches him or gets chance to challange him he wont be discouraged by bhagoda dawood he will leap to the oppurtinity. So your example is nullified completely.

  12. Schin Personal vendetta is personal vendetta. Shakuni also ran away that didn’t stop sahadeva from killing him jayadratha ran away still that didn’t stop bhim from teaching him a lesson and arjuna from killing him. So you bhagoda warrior theory is utter rubbish and nonsense. If you have vendetta you will hunt the person till the depths and if you have the guts and that person is in front of you You will definitely jump on him So stop crying foul your self. Your stupid shivaji example punctured statement is utter rubbish. The example stands fresh as ever. Virat yudh was supernatural. So far you haven’t come up with the parmavir chakra point yet but I am sure you will shortly.

  13. @ Niraj,

    Your statement-”If jarasandha has an itch in his rear its he who has to challenge Krishna.”

    My ans- FYI, Jarasandh indeed challengeed Krishna, when he attacked Mathura BUT… B…U….T…..the great krishna RAN AWAY from that challenge…… Hence Jarasandh didnt want to insult himself by fighting with a Bhagoda warrior on 2nd occasion…..

    Your statement-”Krishna leaving mathura point is already nullified by the shivaji example.”

    My ans- Ha..ha…ha…ha…. This just like Claiming 1 + 1 = 3, because Shivaji killed Afzal khan….. Ha..ha…ha…ha…. Giving irrelavant example wont prove your point….. And your Shivaji example has already been punctured…..

    Your statement-”if the same sant asaraam says that his own son naryan sai defeated entire battalion of Pakistan soldiers singlehandedly then Sachin will believe him as Sant Asarams biasedness is not nature defying.”

    My ans- Irrelevant comparision…… Vyas did not just said that Arjun defeated Whole Kuru army at Viraat, but he gave a micro-detail description of that war which was totally practical & had nothing supernatural in it….. So stop crying foul play Niraj, because i know you are finding it very difficult to gulp down the humiliating thrashing of your favourite character in Viraat war…. I really feel sorry for you, BUT you cannot change the fact….

  14. @ Smarty,

    Atlast, Smarty is back to argue with me after his self imposed “Dodging” exile is over….. Ok, lets see for how long Smarty sustains in debate with me before Dodging & then going into self imposed “Dodging” exile again……

    Your statement-”Arjuna was asked by ved vyas strictly to go to DEVRAJ INDRA’s KINGDOM, and learn special weapons from him. otherwise pandavas chances were zero against those three generals.(source KMG MB THE ONLY AUTHENTIC BOOK WHEN IT COMES TO KAURAVA BASHING)”

    My ans- Ha…ha…ha….ha…. As usual Samrty at his funny best….. You are again into your age old trics of giving undue credit to Arjun’s arsenal/Car/Bow etc, which is a worthless attempt from your side….. And For your kind information, Arjun thrashed Karna at Draupdi Swayamwar which happened much before Arjun went to Devlok….. So stop crying like a sour loser…..

    And collecting celestial weapons was also a favourite habit of Karna, who left Drona’s ashram just because Drona refused to give him Brahmastra & then he went to Parshuram to collect all kinds of celestial weapons, Vijaya Bow etc….. But still after acquiring those high weapons, Karna still got thrashed by Arjun, Bhima, Satyaki, Drupad, Abhimanyu, Gandharvas etc…. Such a poor loser….

    Your statement-”fact is Krishna gave the option , but Jarashandha refuse to die fighting Krishna.”

    My ans- Fact is that when Jarasandh chose Krishna for a head-on battle, then Krishna RAN AWAY from Mathura….. Hence Jarasandh didnt want to insult himself by fighting with a Bhagoda warrior on 2nd occasion…..

    Your statement-”Fact is Karna who vanquished Jarashandha, rated Krishna superior to all.”

    My ans- Ha…ha…ha….ha…. The super warrior Krishna rated Shalya as the best on 18th day, so does it make Shalya as the best warrior ?? Childish logic…. Grow up from your comedy theories smarty….

    Your statement-”why Krishna worshiping was mandatory for pandavas. becs they were the puppets the actual ruler everyone knows.”

    My ans- Ha…ha…ha….ha…. Childish claim again…. Pandavas worshipped every King at rajsuya Yagya, so does this prove that Pandavas were inferior to every king of India ???? People making the weakest kings(Yudi) as Samraat ???? What a logic ??

    Your statement-”he overlooks that on 12 day when Karna was engaged in fight with arjuna , 5 mighty warriors surrounded and tried to kill karna. Luckily aswatthama and others were there.

    My ans- Arey bhai…. Khud hi question poonchate ho aur khudhi jawaaba dete ho….. Karna was also supported by many kuru warriors, so where is the foul play in this ?? Bekaar mein Rai ka pahaad bana rahe ho….

    I believe you are only posting in this blog for time-pass, just like a Std 2nd Student attending a Medical conference for time-pass, similalry you dont have the basic knowledge of Politics/war of MB times & still you behave as if you are the scholar of MB history…. Isey kehte hai – “BEGANI MEHFIL MEIN ABDULLA DEEWANA”…

    1. here comes suppandi part 2 . ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

      keep on posting , superb good jokes. one day you will become a iconic Character like suppandi.

      but for that you have to show your ability outside the blog also.

      1. Wow…. The “Dodger” at his best…..
        The “Dodger” Smarty didnt even last for one post of his arguement with me & lost it completely by Dodging it …. Way to go Smarty…..

        Smarty ki to bolti hi band ho gayi…. Ha…ha…ha….ha….

        And outside this blog only ignorant kids discuss MB who dont have proper knowledge of MB….. I believe you should start participating in those blogs(of FB etc)…..

  15. i think this blog is the only pass time of sachin, he wants to create controversy just for fun sake and making stupid and baseless claims.

    for continuing his pass time he will make a joke of Arjuna also. and he has done that.

    He is accusing arjuna of unfair fight.

    he overlooks that on 12 day when Karna was engaged in fight with arjuna , 5 mighty warriors surrounded and tried to kill karna.

    Luckily aswatthama and others were there.

    but same rules what is foul is foul committed by which ever side.

    instead of contesting we should enjoy his opinions, becs we hardly read TINKLE these days and i miss suppandi’s antics.

  16. When Arjun thrashed Duryo & brought him under his mercy, then Duryo was also supported by whole Kuru gang…. When 100 Kauravas got killed By Bhima then they were all supported by full kuru gang……

    It was only Pandavas’ mercy & truthfullness which saved Duryo at Dyuta

    don’t mislead anyone and you cant sachin,

    Arjuna was asked by ved vyas strictly to go to DEVRAJ INDRA’s KINGDOM, and learn special weapons from him.

    otherwise pandavas chances were zero against those three generals.(source KMG MB THE ONLY AUTHENTIC BOOK WHEN IT COMES TO KAURAVA BASHING)

    have you read that or not.

    Virat war happen after that and don’t change the chronology also.

    fact is Krishna gave the option , but Jarashandha refuse to die fighting Krishna.

    Fact is Karna who vanquished Jarashandha, rated Krishna superior to all.

    now if you again bring your comedy theory like glorification.

    If X says Y is better than Z, than it can be debated since Z has not accepted y’s superiority.

    But if X says y is better than him, than who can oppose.

    Fact is Bhisma who always praised Arjuna , bowed to Krishna .

    fact is you talk without facts.

    why Krishna worshiping was mandatory for pandavas. becs they were the puppets the actual ruler everyone knows.

    Sahadeva then answered (Sisupala) in words of grave import, saying,–’If amongst ye there be any king that cannot bear to see Kesava of dark hue, the slayer of Kesi, the possessor of immeasurable energy, worshipped by me, this my foot is placed on the heads of all mighty ones (like him). When I say this, let that one give me an adequate reply. And let those kings that possess intelligence approve the worship of Krishna who is the preceptor, the father, the guru, and deserveth the Arghya and the worship (already offered unto him).’

    “When Sahadeva thus showed his foot, no one among those intelligent and wise and proud and mighty monarchs said anything. And a shower of flowers fell on Sahadeva’s head, and an incorporeal voice said–’Excellent, excellent.’

  17. Sachins dialogue “ The first & foremost thing which i preach is the “LAWS OF NATURE” & after this everything comes second….. Hence i preach Vyas only till his MB story is practical” So according to Sachin if Sant Asaram says that he saw a chamtkari person with his maya protecting Indian soldiers then Sachin wont believe him as its against laws of nature but if the same sant asaraam says that his own son naryan sai defeated entire battalion of Pakistan soldiers singlehandedly then Sachin will believe him as Sant Asarams biasedness is not nature defying.