Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

9,385 thoughts on “Greatest Warrior of All Time

  1. Sachins ans- Ha..ha…ha…. Utter non-sense EXCUSE….. For you the powers of Bhishma/Vidura suddenly becomes significant when it comes to downgrading the achievments of Pandavas(viz Rajusuya yagya)…. But the same powers of Bhishma/Vidura suddenly becomes insignificant when it comes to upgrading the achievments of Pandavas…..!! Yur Hipoocratic personal opinions are rubbish as always…. Hence invalid……

    Ha..ha…ha…. Miyan, Bhais ne chaara khai bhi nahi ki aap Dahi jamaane lage….. By Vastra-haran/Dyuta, i meant insult of Draupdi at Dyuta….. And i had given practically explaination of Gandhari stopping the attempted Vastra-haran(or it not at all happening)… so where is the question of supernatual here ??? Aap to jab dekho tab Ghode par sawaar ho jaate ho….
    Your statement-“My ans is of course a nincompoop warrior who even cant defeat multiple bandits what will he defeat a battalion of trained maharathis. So now you have sanctioned the virat yudha as fake or overglorification.”
    NZ players’ arguement….. Because you arleady lost this arguement previously…. So you are not authorised to blabber any non-sense about Viraat war again…..
    Your statement-“And you prove it from KMG pandavas subdued hastinapur with passages instead of shouting main rajsuya rajsuya chillaoonga kurta phaadke.”
    My ans- I already proved by relevant passages that Dhritrashtra accepted Pandavas’ Subjugation by accepting Pandavas’ invitation & actually attending the ceremony….. Now, if you dont know the basic ABCD of Rajsuya Yagya then that is your problem….. If i am giving you the Einstien’s theory of relativity, & if you dont even know the basics of class 4th science, then i am not here to teach you all the science basics from Class 4th to science graduate level…. Similalry, if you dont know the basic rules of Rajsuya Yagya, then it is your problem…… Further you have been a NZ player of first order, because some months back you yourself had searched the meaning of Rajsuya Yagya from wikipedia & you yourself had accepted these rules but now you are behaving like ignorant bloggers like Smarty/Sanjay who dont know the ABCD of MB or Rajsuya Yagya….. After-all Sangat ka asar to padenga hee….. Ha..ha…ha….

    My ans Sachin bottom line is that you cannot show passages on pandavas conquering all at rajsuya yagna secondly I have already proven Virat yudha supernatural. You didn’t win that argument you came up with explaination that by this logic all battles at MB are supernatural. I agreed and you accused me of being hypocrite. Its not meaning of Rajsuya yagna its what actually happened is the criteria.

  2. @ Niraj,

    Your statement-“Indraprastha was won by duryodhana it was duryodhana property no dhirtharashtra and now in this time zone Duryodhana was in the driving seat.”

    My ans- Ha..ha…ha…. Utter non-sense EXCUSE….. For you the powers of Bhishma/Vidura suddenly becomes significant when it comes to downgrading the achievments of Pandavas(viz Rajusuya yagya)…. But the same powers of Bhishma/Vidura suddenly becomes insignificant when it comes to upgrading the achievments of Pandavas…..!! Yur Hipoocratic personal opinions are rubbish as always…. Hence invalid……

    Your statement-“As regards your question why couldn’t bheeshma vidura stop vastra haran. Congrat I welcome your entry in the I believe in the supernatural club. So now you believe in Shalpya parva section 62 arjuina chariot burning into flames.”

    My ans- Ha..ha…ha…. Miyan, Bhais ne chaara khai bhi nahi ki aap Dahi jamaane lage….. By Vastra-haran/Dyuta, i meant insult of Draupdi at Dyuta….. And i had given practically explaination of Gandhari stopping the attempted Vastra-haran(or it not at all happening)… so where is the question of supernatual here ??? Aap to jab dekho tab Ghode par sawaar ho jaate ho….

    Your statement-“My ans is of course a nincompoop warrior who even cant defeat multiple bandits what will he defeat a battalion of trained maharathis. So now you have sanctioned the virat yudha as fake or overglorification.”

    My ans- NZ players’ arguement….. Because you arleady lost this arguement previously…. So you are not authorised to blabber any non-sense about Viraat war again…..

    Your statement-“And you prove it from KMG pandavas subdued hastinapur with passages instead of shouting main rajsuya rajsuya chillaoonga kurta phaadke.”

    My ans- I already proved by relevant passages that Dhritrashtra accepted Pandavas’ Subjugation by accepting Pandavas’ invitation & actually attending the ceremony….. Now, if you dont know the basic ABCD of Rajsuya Yagya then that is your problem….. If i am giving you the Einstien’s theory of relativity, & if you dont even know the basics of class 4th science, then i am not here to teach you all the science basics from Class 4th to science graduate level…. Similalry, if you dont know the basic rules of Rajsuya Yagya, then it is your problem…… Further you have been a NZ player of first order, because some months back you yourself had searched the meaning of Rajsuya Yagya from wikipedia & you yourself had accepted these rules but now you are behaving like ignorant bloggers like Smarty/Sanjay who dont know the ABCD of MB or Rajsuya Yagya….. After-all Sangat ka asar to padenga hee….. Ha..ha…ha….

    1. Mr. Absconder,

      Hum teenon ki phir bhi sangat to HAI……Aapki sangat bhi aapki baaten samajh nahin paati aur aapko akeyla CHHOD KAR BHAAG JAATIN HAIN….

      Aapki baatein sirf Aapke liye hi hain!!

  3. Sanjay to Sachin two days back:

    “having said that can you enumerate how many such WORSHIPPED kings were offered ARAGHYA?? Now you will go absconding…..!!”

    See guys! how correct I was……Sachin is absconding on my question……

  4. Sachin your question why couldn’t vidura bheehsma make dhritharashtra return indraprashta
    My ans Indraprastha was won by duryodhana it was duryodhana property no dhirtharashtra and now in this time zone Duryodhana was in the driving seat. So your question is a nonsense babble. As regards your question why couldn’t bheeshma vidura stop vastra haran. Congrat I welcome your entry in the I believe in the supernatural club. So now you believe in Shalpya parva section 62 arjuina chariot burning into flames. Your babble on `1000 arrows is over glorification. My ans is of course a nincompoop warrior who even cant defeat multiple bandits what will he defeat a battalion of trained maharathis. So now you have sanctioned the virat yudha as fake or overglorification. And you prove it from KMG pandavas subdued hastinapur with passages instead of shouting main rajsuya rajsuya chillaoonga kurta phaadke.

  5. @ Niraj,

    Your statement-“Read my passage carefully. Subjugation ka zikar kahi nahee hai. Pandavas wanted a high profile yagya Jealous people will stop it. Human psychology. Karna and eklavya performed feats of archery arjuna needed laxatives didn’t he ? Now if Kripa puts a leash on arjuna that doesn’t mean karna has conquered arjuna. Same is with kingdoms Rajsuya was a large scale yagna and those who were pandava hostile will not like it. Dhirtharasthra and company were pandava hostile but put on a leash by Bheehsma Vidura etc But same cant be said of Jarasandha.”

    My ans- Ha..ha…ha…. Funny personal opinion as ever….. Prove it from KMG or Dont talk in air Niraj…..

    Dhirtharasthra and company were put on a leash by Bheehsma Vidura etc for Rajsuya Yagya…??? Ha..ha…ha…. Prove it from KMG or Dont talk in air….. I wonder why Dhirtharasthra and company were not put on a leash by Bheehsma Vidura etc at the time of Vastra-haran/Dyuta, which occured just after the Rajsuya Yagya ??? Or you want to say that Bhishma/Vidura supported the Vastra-haran/Dyuta ?? And why couldnt Bhishma/Vidura make Dhritrashtra to return the Indraprasth to Pandavas after 13 yr exile, so as to avoid the war ??? So stop giving funny EXCUSES……. You clearly lost this debate…..

    Your statement-“Arjuna hai imaan mera bhima meri zindagi then yes 1000 arrows fired from arjunas bow is possible. But chariot bursting into flames isn’t.”

    My ans- I never claimed that firing 1000 arrows in one second was possible….. Offcourse it is just an over-glorification of a simple event of one archer firing multiple arrows rapidly in short time……

  6. Sachin ans- Well well well…… So Niraj you accepted that subjugating whole India(including Jarasandh) was compulsory for Rajsuya Yagya….. Great…..!! I won the debate….. Thanks for participation…. So i proved my point that Pandavas Subjugated whole India including Dwarika, Hastinapur, Angdesh etc …….

    My ans Read my passage carefully. Subjugation ka zikar kahi nahee hai. Pandavas wanted a high profile yagya Jealous people will stop it. Human psychology. Karna and eklavya performed feats of archery arjuna needed laxatives didn’t he ? Now if Kripa puts a leash on arjuna that doesn’t mean karna has conquered arjuna. Same is with kingdoms Rajsuya was a large scale yagna and those who were pandava hostile will not like it. Dhirtharasthra and company were pandava hostile but put on a leash by Bheehsma Vidura etc But same cant be said of Jarasandha. Smarty reading here its IMPOSSIBLE to fire 1000 arrows by a bow. Reading MB you have to believe in supernatural. If you apply the Sachin approach of Science ( Which Sachin claims he is using ) in reading MB then you will be left with a 3 page book. Yes if you apply the Sachin actual approach which is as follows. Arjuna hai imaan mera bhima meri zindagi then yes 1000 arrows fired from arjunas bow is possible. But chariot bursting into flames isn’t.

  7. King Bharat is said to have performed 100’s of Ashwamedha yagas and not even a single Rajsuya yaga. Lord Rama performed Ashwamedha yaga where he ended up meeting his lost family. Many other kings mentioned in MB did multiple Ashwamedha yagas and this Yudi seems to be the only king doing Rajsuya yaga……Ashwamedha yaga established Rule of ONE king i.e. the won over EMPIRE in actual sense….Ashwamedha yaga was probably never repeated in recorded history for its supremacy and the eligible results which were beyond the strength of later kings but we find few of later period kings attempting Rajsuya yaga. Even Asoka the great and Akbar the great could never accomplish Ashwamedha yaga what to talk about other kings. this historical evidence proves that Rajsuya yaga was NEVER a “Conquering ALL” concept.

  8. @ Niraj,

    Your statement-“there were 4 super powers. Hastinapur Indraprastha Dwarka and Magadha. Indraprastha and dwarka on one side. Powerful Hastinapur with Manmohan singh like leader (Dhirtharashtra ) at other end. Just an invitation was enough and bheeshma and vidura who succeeded in making Yudhi yuvraaj despite King dhirtharashtra can ensure no aggression from that end. That Leaves out Jarasandha
    Pandavas strategy was as follows jenhe takat se jeet sakte hain takat se jeeto jinhe takat se nahee jeet sakte manipulation zindabaad.”

    My ans- Well well well…… So Niraj you accepted that subjugating whole India(including Jarasandh) was compulsory for Rajsuya Yagya….. Great…..!! I won the debate….. Thanks for participation….

    So i proved my point that Pandavas Subjugated whole India including Dwarika, Hastinapur, Angdesh etc …….

    1. ha ha ha ha , look guys the fail scientist sachin is back again with his funny stuff.

      Rajasuya yagna . scientist talking about yagna ha ha ha ha ha ha.

      what a fake scientist he is .

  9. Sanjay and Niraj,

    Purpose of rajasuya yagna is cleary given. Millitary conquest and the yagna had got very little connection.

    Parashurama almost wiped out the khstriya race, he never performed any such yagna and Bharat ruled entire Aryavart. Hr never performed any suc yagna.

    And here it is see instead reading any science novel this retarded sachin is reading. MB.

    From blowing conch to limitless antics, he had superceded every child.

    Him not reading othet books is well known,

    There warriors dont shoot thousand arrows at one time

    Ha ha,

    Is bache sachin ko sab chaahiye,

    Heroes I mean superheroes, science bhi.

    Someone tell him yagna mein ghi daalte hain koi chemical solution nahi.

    By the way why did yudi spent so much money on a supernatural thing like yagna instead of drinking, smoking party charty.

  10. What happened to this fail scientist.

    Why is he talking so much about yagna.

    In which lab or research centre yagna are performed.

    Yagna are performed simply for religious purposes.

    Rajasuya yagna purpose is cleary given. It was for providing King pandu the option to attian the place of Devraj Indra.

    That is why sahadeva pleaded before many. Kings.

    But this fail scientist has got no such knowledge.

    And which retarded will claim that pandavas will give away their hard earn because they wish so.

    Yudi the emperor knowing very well that he will lose everything isparticipated, is more shameful than attending on the invitation.

    Just saying yudi is the emperor is not big enough yudi never got any respect from kauravas.

    To sum up this guy sachin is a joke. Just laugh at him.

    Even a kid talk more sensible than this retarded sachin.

    I am pretty sure he is taking medication or is undergoing treatment.

    No sensible person even trying hard cannot talk like him.

    Guys we should leave in his case. It is good to laugh at his condition.

  11. My ans- Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha… Ye to wohi baat ho gayi.. ki… Miyan Science ki ABCD to aati nahi aur chale Newtons laws of motion pe discuss karne…… Sanjay Miyaan, pehle Vyas Mb ki ABCD to pad lo, fir baad mein iss blog mein apna muh kholna….. Varna har baar isi tarah Fajiti ho jayengi….
    Here are the passages which proves that Yudi worshipped every King at Rajsuya Yagya:
    “And all the Kshatriya monarchs, having approached the virtuous Yudhishthira who had bathed after the conclusion of the sacrifice, said these words : ‘By good fortune thou hast come out successful. O virtuous one, thou hast obtained the imperial dignity. O thou of the Ajamida race, by thee hath been spread the fame of thy whole race. And, O king of kings, by this act of thine, thou hast also acquired great religious merit. WE HAVE BEEN WORSHIPPED BY THEE TO THE FULL EXTENT OF OUR DESIRES.
    We now tell thee that we are desirous of returning to our own kingdoms.IT BEHOVETH THEE TO GRANT US PERMISSION.’ “HEARING THESE WORDS OF THE MONARCHS, KING YUDHISHTHIRA THE JUST, WORSHIPPING EACH AS HE DESERVED, commanded his brothers,.. ”
    ===========================
    To Sanjay Miyaan…. Apna khud ka majaak banaane se pehle do baar soch liya karo….. Rest all of your posts are childish & only laughable, hence i can do just one thing after reading them & i.e…… Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…

    Sanjay – Good to see you are trying hard to be INDIAN by using hindi words in your post…….Sachin in OUR INDIA we have a tradition – we welcome our guests when they arrive, we treat them with due respect when they are in stay with us and we see them off with respect when they desire to leave. Yudi was an INDIAN king and not an ENGLISH nomadic invader who was alien to such customs. So he behaved like an INDIAN would do to his guests. May be in VILAYAT or some other planet even folded hands with namastey gesture would mean something else.
    By sharing such kiddish text you have proved your non-existent understading of INDIAN traditions. You have still not understood my comment on the subject which is nothing new. I do not know what you ENGLISH people call “Araghya” in your language but it is the TRIBUTE of highest order bestowed on somebody who is akin to Lord among the gathering. I am using “Lord” because your ENGLISH thoughts can connect easily with what I am trying to say…having said that can you enumerate how many such WORSHIPPED kings were offered ARAGHYA?? Now you will go absconding…..!!

    Your ignorance is legendary in this blog – you keep declaring Karna supporters KG students and boast that it is below your standard to discuss with us yet you keep coming back to us only as a lost child looking for MAMAA….!
    Let me also remind you that MB is an epic and it is your ignorance only which pushes you to read it like a SCIENCE book. If you would have read it even like a poem you would have done yourself a favour. If you are looking for science or logic read some science book or Sherlock Holmes..!

  12. Jarasandha was like a bull in a China shop. He had constipation against Krishna and his well wishers. He did not have pandava well wishers like Vidura bheeshma to put a leash on him like dhritharashtra isliye sher ki naak mein nakel daalna zaroori thaa. I had answered this non contextual question of yours many months ago. In that time zone there were 4 super powers. Hastinapur Indraprastha Dwarka and Magadha. Indraprastha and dwarka on one side. Powerful Hastinapur with Manmohan singh like leader (Dhirtharashtra ) at other end. Just an invitation was enough and bheeshma and vidura who succeeded in making Yudhi yuvraaj despite King dhirtharashtra can ensure no aggression from that end. That Leaves out Jarasandha
    Pandavas strategy was as follows jenhe takat se jeet sakte hain takat se jeeto jinhe takat se nahee jeet sakte manipulation zindabaad. Final output of Pandavas Jigar mein koi khaas dam nahee fir bhi hesityat kisi se kam nahee. In any case this if and but is stupid logic. To show pandavas subjugating India you have to show lines NOT logic. All you can show is invitations by pandavas to powerful countries like hastinapur etc followed by some stupid laughter and equally stupid logic.

  13. @ Niraj,

    I had asked you the same simple question of “if subjugating whole India was not compulsory, then why the hell Pandavas first killed Jarasandh ?? Pandavas could have performed the Rajsuya Yagya without subjugating Jarasandh & his allys ?????”

    But it seems you are in a state of “DHOONDTE REH JAAONGE”…. And you have caught your own tounge here….. So this proves that i have proved my point clearly that for Rajsuya Yagya, subjugating whole India was compulsory….. Hence Niraj, you are not allowed to blabber any non-sense about Rajsuya Yagya again…..

  14. @ Sanjay,

    Your statement-“HONOURING SUBJUGATED KINGS WAS RITUAL…..ha..ha.ha.ha….how many such subjugated kings were honoured which infuriated subjugated Sisupals in Yudi’s court??? By the way your statement “Krishna was honoured FIRST” made me visualise a long queue of SUBJUGATED kings who were waiting to be given Arghaya but Krishna gate-crashed their party”

    My ans- Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha… Ye to wohi baat ho gayi.. ki… Miyan Science ki ABCD to aati nahi aur chale Newtons laws of motion pe discuss karne…… Sanjay Miyaan, pehle Vyas Mb ki ABCD to pad lo, fir baad mein iss blog mein apna muh kholna….. Varna har baar isi tarah Fajiti ho jayengi….

    Here are the passages which proves that Yudi worshipped every King at Rajsuya Yagya:

    “And all the Kshatriya monarchs, having approached the virtuous Yudhishthira who had bathed after the conclusion of the sacrifice, said these words : ‘By good fortune thou hast come out successful. O virtuous one, thou hast obtained the imperial dignity. O thou of the Ajamida race, by thee hath been spread the fame of thy whole race. And, O king of kings, by this act of thine, thou hast also acquired great religious merit. WE HAVE BEEN WORSHIPPED BY THEE TO THE FULL EXTENT OF OUR DESIRES.
    We now tell thee that we are desirous of returning to our own kingdoms.IT BEHOVETH THEE TO GRANT US PERMISSION.’ “HEARING THESE WORDS OF THE MONARCHS, KING YUDHISHTHIRA THE JUST, WORSHIPPING EACH AS HE DESERVED, commanded his brothers,.. ”
    ===========================

    To Sanjay Miyaan…. Apna khud ka majaak banaane se pehle do baar soch liya karo….. Rest all of your posts are childish & only laughable, hence i can do just one thing after reading them & i.e…… Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…ha…ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…Ha…ha…ha..ha…Ha…

  15. Sachin – Its so funny to see you asking me battery of counter questions instead of answering mine….. And your childish questions only show the KG level of your knowledge about MB…… This is just like a 3 year old kid asking question to adults like – Why is there Sun in the Say & moon in the night ? Why do we sleep ? Why do we eat ? etc etc …..
    But since you atleast dared to answer my questions (unlike Smarty who just RAN AWAY), so i would give replies to your funny questions…Although i have answered those questions on many occasiona previosly….

    Sanjay – As expected whenever you do not have answers you start blaming others being in KG. It happened during many discussions on spirituality, supernaturality of Virat war and now Rajsuya yaga. This blog is witness who asked whom first? You were definitely under some intoxication that you did not find my answers to your questions so I am re-posting for you to come out of your slumber and realise that I HAD ANSWERED YOUR QUESTIONS IN THE SAME POST….!!!!
    May 17, 2015 at 12:45 pm

    Another clueless question coming from Mr. Sachin the Great –
    Q1. Since your immaturity says that Pandavas did not subjugate whole India, so by that you mean to say that there was no compulsion to subjugate whole India for Rajsuya Yagya, then WHY THE HELL PANDAVAS KILLED JARASANDH ?? Panadavs could have avoided subjugating Jarasandh altogether & could have subjugated only limited kingdoms of their choice …..??
    My ans – This blog and its regular bloggers are witness to YOUR THEORY THAT JARASANDH KILLING WAS KRISHNA’S PLANNING TO USE PANDAVAS TO ELIMINATE HIS ENEMY. Today MR SACHIN THE GREAT IS GIVING CREDIT TO PANDAVAS?????
    Now you have to tell ALL OF US whom the real credit should go to prove that you have some clue of what you keep typing in this blog….!!
    Following is the in-your-face answer from your favourite KMG to your clueless question –
    “After bringing the SON OF JARASANDHA under his sway by CONCILIATION and making him pay tribute”
    Why did Bhima have to CONCILIATE with son of Jarasandh whom he killed? It was just a matter of commanding the instruction after all…..!!
    ===========
    Your other questions:
    Q.2: Why was Yudi called the EMPEROR of India (Samraat) after Rajsuya Yagya ?? Or do you want to say that Yudi was the Emperor of only limited number of Kingdoms & not whole India ??
    Ans – Answer is in your question itself – “After Rajsuya yaga”…he was the only king who performed ‘Rajsuya yaga’ approved by all kings in India. This yaga was performed over number of days and was not just one-day celebration ceremony. The whole community was invited including all castes. To host such large community and entertain it one needed lot of wealth and resources which did not come from perfomer’s bank account but was a community initiative. For example, langar (community feasts) in Gurudwara etc is funded by the community only. EMPEROR is a title given to the Performer of the sacrifice who has approval of all contemporary kings. It is later in the history that greedy and cruel kings relied more on their military powers to declare themselves as EMPEROR. This made people form a perception that EMPEROR is the mightiest one. The EMPEROR had to be RIGHTEOUS to be eligible to perform such pious sacrifices with participation of ALL. Yudi was dharamraj hence apt to carry out the yaga. This does not mean that ALL were afraid of performer.
    Q.3: What is the Meaning of an EMPEROR (Samraat) ??
    Ans – Already explained above…