Leave a Reply

8,840 thoughts on “Greatest Warrior of All Time

  1. Sanjay,

    VED VYAS is the author of MB. if the author of ved vyas is held in suspicion for inserting so many false supernatural events.

    how can the book written by him be authentic . ultimately there is only one author of MB Ved Vyas.

    who else had written MB other than Ved Vyas.

    ultimately MB is ved vyas creation like so many supernatural events. if one is false how can the characters written by it can be held original. if supernatural events with Karna glorification can be done

    where are books on MB written by others to challenge it .

  2. Approaching that multitude of elephants and getting into the midst of that fastness which was inaccessible to a car, THE SON OF PANDU, DESIROUS OF SAVING HIS LIFE, REFRAINED FROM STRIKING THE SON OF RADHA.

    now explain this.

  3. Hello guys,

    It was Shalya who saved Karna on 17th day from Bhima by taking him away from Bhima.

    Then Karna pierced him with five and twenty arrows, like a hunter striking a proud and infuriate elephant in the forest with a number of blazing brands. His limbs mangled with those shafts, his eyes red with rage and the desire of revenge, the son of Pandu, insensate with wrath, and impelled by the desire of slaying the Suta’s son, fixed on his bow an excellent shaft of great impetuosity, capable of bearing a great strain, and competent to pierce the very mountains. Forcibly drawing the bow-string to his very ear, the son of the Wind-god, that great bowman, filled with wrath and desirous of making an end of Karna, sped that shaft. Thus sped by the mighty Bhima, that shaft, making a noise loud as that of the thunder, pierced through thunderbolt Karna in that battle, like the thunderbolt itself piercing through a mountain. Struck by Bhimasena, O perpetuator of Kuru’s race, the Suta’s son, that commander (of thy forces), sat down senseless on the terrace of his car. The ruler of the Madras then, beholding the Suta’s son deprived of his senses, bore that ornament of battle away on his car, from that fight. Then after Karna’s defeat, Bhimasena began to rout the vast Dhartarashtra host like Indra routing the danavas.'”

  4. Everyone has the right to write his own Mahabharata but the original Vyas Mahabharata will remain the most authentic book on Mahabharata. Kishari Mohan Ganguly has only translated Vyas MB in Einglish. In fact this translated book is not KMG MB but Vyas MB. Kishari Mohan Ganguly has not given his own views like Romesh Dutta and Rajgopalachari. So we can not compare critical books on MB with Vyas MB.

    Regarding Karna vs Bhima battle of 14th day, I don’t think Bhima proved to be a Nanga Bhikhari or a lesser warrior than Karna. And if we talk about Bhima’s humiliation in last round, than Karna’s defeats in that battle were more humiliating. Karna got the extra chariot and cover fire from kaurava princes, still Bhima defeated him. I would not say that Karna was an ordinary warrior. But he seems to be overconfident and arrogant most of the times. His performence in rangshala and on 17th day, proves that he was special.

  5. Sachin – Mere asking questions & not reading the answers wont help you sanjay…. It will only show you ignorance…..
    The reason for limited effectiveness of Celestial weapons has been explained in this blog on umpteeen times….. But as per your age old habit, you have a knack of not reading the ANSWERS & acting IGNORANT & then asking the same questions again & again

    Sanjay – First of all no question was put to you. Second these days I do not waste my time reading your repeated banters of Sachin Puran. I do not buy your theories at all because missiles are not fired from bows…..because weapons whether ordinary or superior or celestial once shot do not evaporate in air…..because nowhere in your Vyas MB it is written that so and so was WMD or not. They hit somewhere or their target resulting in damage or destruction. So many celestial weapons or superior missiles are just mentioned being shot without any result. Were the shooters crazy or weapons were furfurri??

    By the way who told you that your theories have impressed me or they are the word of almighty??

    You have problem with Sanskrit scholars commentary but you yourself keep challenging what is written in Vyas MB….you are the most Hippocratic and confused blogger I have ever seen. It has been observed earlier also that you are here for time pass without any intelligent contribution to the discussion. The way you are going on repeating same non-sense with Niraj is recent proof of your vailapanti….find some good job for you to be busy. This will help you restrain your idle and hallucinated thoughts.

    —————-

    Sachin to Niraj – We have had this discussion on umpteen times previously….. And we all (including you) had agreed to follow VYas MB (KMG or Geeta Press), because KMG & Geeta Press only did the word to word translation of Vyas MB… unlike Ramesh Menon, C. Rajagopalachari, BORI etc who INSERTED their own opinions in their books…..Now, no one from us is a Sanskrit Scholar…. But even if you become a Sanskrit Scholar, then still you will get the same translation which KMG or Geea press had done…..The authenticity of KMG translation is itself proved by the fact that KMG is exactly similar to Hindi translation of Geeta press….. So you refusing to eat your Chill pill wont do any good to you

    Sanjay – HA….HA…..HA….HA…..HA…..HA…..HA……look who is talking and what is he talking….!! Joke of the century….arre bhai then have the guts to accept KMG as it is. It is you only who keep taking off on Scientific voyages every now and then leaving Vyas and KMG both bewildered with your jumping jack attitude on MB……ha..ha..ha….ha…funny post, my friend. You cannot get more confused than this..!

    @Niraj,

    Bhima hiding behind heaps of elephants is the clear proof of him fearing for his life. You do not hide in wars to play hide and seek.

  6. @ Niraj,

    Your statement-“Delhi court has taken strong exception to two contradictory meanings of a particular shloka (verse) of the Holy Gita, published by the Gita Press, well-known publishers of Hindu religious books, and asked it to rectify the error. The Yathartha Foundation had filed a petition in Delhi’s Tees Hazari Court bringing to light two different and contradictory meanings of shloka number 10 of Chapter 1 in two books — Shrimad Bhagwad Gita and Gita Prabodhini.”

    My ans- Firstly, this issue has nothing to do with Vyas MB of Geeta press & it is related to other two books of Geeta press viz. Shrimad Bhagwad Gita and Gita Prabodhini…… So i dont know why are you grabbing the neck of Geeta press just because they did one mistake in whole two books of theirs ?? Further it has nothing to do with Vyas MB of Geeta press……

    Now, this incident further proves my point that Geeta press Vyas MB & KMG-MB are considered as AUTHENTIC AS-IT-IS translation of Vyas MB…. that is why any common man can challenge these books at court of law if they find any descripencies in its translations……. But the books of pvt authors(C. Rajagopalachari, BORI etc) are not the proclaimed “AS-IT-IS” translation of Vyas MB, & the authors also do not claim so…. further they only gave their own opinions/inferences about the incidences of MB in their respective books…. So no one challenge such authors in court of law, because these authors will only say in their defence that they never claimed that their books had AS-IT-IS translation of Vyas MB….. Further, the court of law will not give any special attention to what these pvt non-authentic authors have opined in their books…..

    So stop raising childish questions over authenticity of KMG/Geeta press Vyas MB…. it is only showing your desperate cry for your lost ice-creame……

  7. sachin i think you are mistaken,

    VED VYAS Didn’t come to personally help KMG.

    like KMG, Ramesh menon are translator of MB work.

  8. KMGs sloppiness has been proven by me on umpteen occasions now let me tackle Gita Press. Already errors are being found about it. As follows““ Delhi court has taken strong exception to two contradictory meanings of a particular shloka (verse) of the Holy Gita, published by the Gita Press, well-known publishers of Hindu religious books, and asked it to rectify the error. The Yathartha Foundation had filed a petition in Delhi’s Tees Hazari Court bringing to light two different and contradictory meanings of shloka number 10 of Chapter 1 in two books — Shrimad Bhagwad Gita and Gita Prabodhini. There are 18,000 shlokas in the Gita. The shloka in question is: aparyaptam tad asmakam balam bhismabhirakshitam; paryaptam tv idam etesam balam bhimabhirakshitam.The meaning in Hindi of the shloka in the Shrimad Bhagwad Gita our army (the Kauravas), which is under Bhishma Pitamaha’s protection, is unbeatable; whereas, the army under Bhishma’s protection (the Pandavas) is incapable of victory in the battle of Mahabharata. The meaning in the Gita Prabodhini indicates, on seeing Dronacharya’s silence, Duryodhan thought that the Kauravas’ army is not capable of victory because of Bhishma Pitamaha’s neutral stand; whereas, the Pandavas’ army is under Bhimsen’s protection and capable of victory.
    Gita Press argued that “various other publications have also assigned the same meaning/interpretation to the shloka as assigned by Gita Prabodhini. The Gita Prabodhini is an explanatory note to the original book Shrimad Bhagwat Gita”.
    However, this failed to satisfy Justice Rakesh Kumar Singh. Delivering his judgment on the matter recently, he said: “After going through the record, I am of the opinion that irrespective of any opinion published in any other book the defendant is bound to give same meaning, interpretation or explanation to one shloka in its every publication and cannot escape for its duty towards the reader to do so on the ground that certain other publication has also given some other meaning . Therefore the defendant (Gita Press) cannot rely on any other publication to justify its own contradictions in two different books of its publication.”
    The English meaning of the shloka, according to the late Swami Prabhupad, founder of International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON), is, “Our strength is immeasurable, and we are perfectly protected by Grandfather Bhisma, whereas, the strength of the Pandavas, carefully protected by Bhima is limited.” Sidharth Pratap Singh, general secretary, Yathartha Foundation, said in the petition that the meaning of one particular shloka should be same, though explanations may be different. In his legal notice to the Geeta Press, Singh had said that “two contradictory interpretations in two different books published by you demonstrate serious negligence on your part and expunging the wrong interpretation from the book is essential”.

  9. Smartboy Sanjay. A friend of mine who has read the BORI version makes following points clear.
    In the BORI edition Bhima does not spare Karna, only Karna spares Bhima,

    in the BORI edition Karna cuts of Abhimanyu’s bow fairly and upfront.
    This even I have prooven from KMG in the blog fall of maharathi vrishasena.

    In the BORI edition Karna fought mildly with Bhima, Below is the quote.

    BORI Quotes – “..Radheya fought mildly with Bhima. However, remembering the earlier enmity, Bhima, the conqueror of enemies, fought with anger and quickly released a shower of arrows..”

    BORI Quotes – “..However, Radheya struck mildly and Pandava struck powerfully.’..”

    in the Critical edition Bhima defeats Karna thrice and Karna defeats Bhima twice, Bhima does not have the opportunity to kill Karna but Karna had the opportunity to kill Bhima but the former spared Bhima.

    In the Critical Edition ( BORI ) Karna never took part in the Drupad war for Gurudakshina, Karna was not even present at the time of war and was drunk during gandharva war.
    Sachins rant on celestial weapons has already been punctured by me. His crappy European armour theory of course did provide some entertainment in the process.

  10. Sachin geeta press can translate from KMG and in any case KMGs confessions have been already recorded. Below is info about the Bhandarkar oriental Research institute.
    Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
    Founded in 1917 and is well known for its collection of old Sanskrit and Prakrit manuscripts.It has 29,000 manuscripts and 1,25,000 Books currently.Critical Edition of the Mahabharata was made by this institute between April 1919 to September 1966;
    2)Recognised by Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan
    The Annals of Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute is right on top on the list of Indological Research Journals by Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan.
    An edition made using 1259 manuscripts and 50 years of research cannot be fake.
    KMG,GEETA PRESS AND BORI CRITICAL EDTION SOURCES-
    -KMG has been translated from Bengali Manuscript along with reference from Bombay edition and some reference from Neelkantha Commentary also.
    -Geeta Press is based on Central Indian devanagari script,they also used few other devanagri editions including Kashmiri sarada script.They also used Dakshinatya and Neelkantha slokas.
    -BORI CRITICAL used all the sources used by KMG and Geeta Press,apart from this,it also used thousand other manuscripts and commentaries as well,took 50 years to complete .
    AUTHENTICITY OF CRITICAL EDITION-
    Critical Edition is the choice of scholars,its made after research from thousands of manuscripts so obviously it would be free from Social,Cultural and Religious interpolations.
    Although ‘critical edition’ itself means ‘most researched’ Still I would list some links and recognitions about BORI Critical-
    1)Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
    Founded in 1917 and is well known for its collection of old Sanskrit and Prakrit manuscripts.It has 29,000 manuscripts and 1,25,000 Books currently.Critical Edition of the Mahabharata was made by this institute between April 1919 to September 1966;

  11. @ Niraj,

    Shant Gada-dhari bhima, Shant….

    We have had this discussion on umpteen times previously….. And we all (including you) had agreed to follow VYas MB (KMG or Geeta Press), because KMG & Geeta Press only did the word to word translation of Vyas MB… unlike Ramesh Menon, C. Rajagopalachari, BORI etc who INSERTED their own opinions in their books…..

    Now, no one from us is a Sanskrit Scholar…. But even if you become a Sanskrit Scholar, then still you will get the same translation which KMG or Geea press had done…..

    The authenticity of KMG translation is itself proved by the fact that KMG is exactly similar to Hindi translation of Geeta press….. So you refusing to eat your Chill pill wont do any good to you…..

  12. @ Sanjay,

    Your statement-“This confirms something like Krishna’s divinity or Arjun’s chariot protection or Devas helping Pandavas etc.. are some valid reasons for their victory and ineffectiveness of extra-ordinary weapons. Now it is upto the people with scientific thinking to apply their scientific theories to find out which scientific logic was working against such weapons.”

    My ans- Mere asking questions & not reading the answers wont help you sanjay…. It will only show you ignorance…..

    The reason for limited effectiveness of Celestial weapons has been explained in this blog on umpteeen times….. But as per your age old habit, you have a knack of not reading the ANSWERS & acting IGNORANT & then asking the same questions again & again…..

  13. mb is not kmgs baap ki jaagir. Private authors accusion is false. All of them are sanskrit scholars. bhandarkar oreinteal research is dedicated to authenticity. bhimas nanga bhikhari status in front of karna is sacntioned there as well. Sachin its you who need a chill pill.

  14. Lo kar lo baat… Now pvt authors like Ramesh Menon, C. Rajagopalachari, BORI etc. will challenge the Original author Vyas….!! Give me a break…..

    Bhima thrashing Karna multiple times & sparing Karna’s life is a fact from Vyas MB….. So take a chill pill people…..

  15. All Sanskrit scholars Ramesh Menon C. Rajagopalachari and even the Bhandarkar oriental research are unanimous that in the Karna vs Bhima duel its Karna who spared bhimas life. KMG translation which is full of typo errors which he has confessed speculates that bhima too spared Karna.

  16. i read some part of Ramesh menon mahabharata, page 302.

    Bhima sparing the life of Karna is nowhere mentioned.

    i cant post the link as it put my post on moderation.

  17. @ Niraj,

    Your statement-“Try to find in MB if Bhishma/Drona/bhagdatt/Ashawtthama/Karna etc ever defeated Arjuna ….. Answer is DHOONDTE REHJAOGE….. Ha..ha..ha… Yes They did. When your opponent is firing a weapon and you are paralyzed with fear standing there its defeat.”

    My ans- Ha..ha..ha… Niraj, I know Arjun felled your ice-creame… So keep crying & keep making your own HAWA-MAHAL full of ice-creams….

  18. Sanjay the general complaint in this blog against divyastras is that no maharathi was killed by it. My ans is that an astra eg braham astra if dhirtadyumna has it drona has it. And they fire it then both brahmastras will neutralize. In Ramayana brahamstras only a elite few had it. Indrajeet Rama Lakshamana hence when lakshamana fires it at atikaya atikaya RIP Rama fires it at Ravana Ravana RIP. Bheeshma did fire brahma weapon at sveta son of virata and it was Sveta RIP. Its funny Arjuna defeats kaurava battalion at virata but never killed any kuru great on his own steam Arjunas integrity unchallengeable. But if these astras duplicate Arjunas feat their integrity is challenged by Arjuna supporters.

  19. From non-scientific point of view Divyastras were divine. From scientific perspective they may be assumed as superior weapons. In either case warriors possessing and using them were well versed and experts of such weapons. There cannot be two opinions about this. Somehow these weapons were fired in Kurukshetra war showing no results on Pandavas. Now what could be the reason for this?

    Reason 1:Warriors were not competent – This cannot be true because multiple warriors cannot become incompetent against same set of enemies in the same war. Even theory of probability will fail to confirm this. A large scale war of such magnitude cannot be fought depending on such incompetent warriors.
    Reason 2:Weapons were incompetent – This is quite possible but in that case their special mention and Arjun wasting his years in acquiring them defies all logic and the whole exercise appears stupid. Thus we are compelled to conclude that there were surely some kinds of extra-ordinary weapons which were surely used in the war.

    Now if competent warriors could not produce expected results with extra-ordinary weapons then the only logical explanation is that something far superior or more divine was working against them making them obsolete and ineffective.

    This confirms something like Krishna’s divinity or Arjun’s chariot protection or Devas helping Pandavas etc.. are some valid reasons for their victory and ineffectiveness of extra-ordinary weapons. Now it is upto the people with scientific thinking to apply their scientific theories to find out which scientific logic was working against such weapons.

  20. And the eternal Mr. boo hoo of this blog who is pretending to laugh speaks
    His query Try to find in MB if Bhishma/Drona/bhagdatt/Ashawtthama/Karna etc ever defeated Arjuna ….. Answer is DHOONDTE REHJAOGE….. Ha..ha..ha…
    Yes They did. When your opponent is firing a weapon and you are paralyzed with fear standing there its defeat. Title song of the movie dabangg the victorious pehelwaan sees Salman khan coming taking of his shirt and then we know what happened . This is what Arjuna achieved and it is defeat for him. Battlefield is different from cricket. In cricket yes your standing at the crease is ok but not in battle. In the film zameen when abhishek bacchan was in the army he also like arjuna was standing the battle helpless in front of the enemies weapon and ajay devgan rescued him. Later on abhishek bachcan was court martialed. Infact Ajay devgans dialogue is as follows. Yeh koi khel ka maidaan nahee hai this is a bloody battlefield. See the movie if you have not. In direct conflict standing like ghughu paralysed with fear ind is also defeat. It may not be in cricket but battle scenes as different.
    I don’t mind giving you some ice cream Sachin. But first I will have to purchase some false teeth for you as I am not sure your teeth is strong enough to bite through it.

  21. @ Niraj,

    And Niraj’s cry for his lost ice-creame continues…. Ha..ha..ha…

    Your non-contextual sour loser arguement has no meaning in front of the stats given by me…..

    And regarding your funny celestial weapon fight, this is just like an average bowler jumping in joy after losing a match, just because he once beat Tendulkar with a bouncer & had a dot ball, but he forgot that he failed to get tendulkar out & tendulkar thrashed that bowler & ultimately scored a century…..

    I feel so sorry for You Karna lovers, who are only left with an option of jumping in joy only when your favourite bowler(Karna) bowls a bouncer & scores a Dot ball (fires celestial weapons)….!! Because your favourite bowler hadnt had the capabilties to take the wicket of any good batsman(Maharathi) [leave alone Tendulkar(Arjun)]….. And nobody cares how many times Tendulakar was beaten by bouncers throughout his career…..

    So you can keep jumping in joy like kids for this insignificant “Bouncer” achievement of Karna, because it wont prove anything & the world will only laugh at your actions…. lol… And it wont change the fact that Tendulkar was the best & no contemporary warrior could defeat Arjun…..

    Try to find in MB if Bhishma/Drona/bhagdatt/Ashawtthama/Karna etc ever defeated Arjuna ….. Answer is DHOONDTE REHJAOGE….. Ha..ha..ha…

  22. Infact Anand came up with a good quote. Let me quote a section of what he quoted again
    “Sanjaya continued, ‘Thus urged by Bhima and Kesava, Savyasachin prevailing over Drona and Karna, began to resist the foe all round.”
    HERE BHIMA URGES ARJUNA TO TACKLE KARNA DRONA ETC KARNA IS NOT FIRING DIVYASTRAS

    NOW LETS SEE ANOTHER SCENE
    Then (Karna) that foremost of Bharata car-warriors, that delighter of all the Bharatas, that first of all persons acquainted with weapons, invoked into existence the Agneya weapon. Dhananjaya, however, baffled by means of his own arrowy downpours the flights of arrows shot by Radha’s son, that warrior of the blazing bow, that hero of bright shafts. And similarly, Adhiratha’s son also baffled the shafts of Arjuna of supreme energy. Resisting Arjuna’s weapons thus by his own, Karna uttered loud shouts and shot many shafts at his antagonist. Then Dhristadyumna and Bhima and the mighty car-warrior Satyaki, all approached Karna, and each of them pierced in with three straight shafts. The son of Radha, however, checking Arjuna’s weapons by his own arrowy showers, cut off with three sharp shafts the bows of those three warriors. Their bows cut off, they looked like snakes without poison.
    HERE KARNA FIRES DIVYASTRA WE SEE DRISHTADYUMNA BHIMA SATYAKI COMING IN. HERE BHIMA IS NOT URGING ARJUNA BUT JUMPING IN TO SUPPORT ARJUNA HENCE THE FACT THAT ARJUNA CAN STAND UP AND GET UPPERHANDS OVER KARNA WHEN KARNA IS NOT FIRINIG DIVYSATRA BUT A DIVYASTRA FIRING KARNA IS A TOUGHTER PROPOSITION FOR ARJUNA IS A FACT RECOGNIZED BY BHIMA AS WELL.

  23. Arjuna vs Karna 7 : 0 in Sachins dream sequence.
    Now Look Sachin I have also have some results to show you
    Arjuna vs Divyastra wielding Karna result Battle day 11 had to be rescued by kaurava maharathis
    Battle day 17 karnas bhargava astra taken away from battle
    Nagaastra had to be rescued by Krishna otherwise there and then RIP Arjuna
    Final battle was lying counting stars against divyastra wielding karna. Was able to kill him only when he was unarmed.
    Arjuna vs naryana astra wielding Ashatthama. Result Standing in a puddle near his feet.
    Arjuna vs Viashnanava astra wielding Bhagdata result same as above.
    Now which divyastra wielding maharathi Arjuna could kill on his own steam
    I started finding this 30 years ago when I was in standard 5. Hey presto I am still finding. The ad which said dhoondte rehjaoge is more applicable to in this case.
    Infact without inexhaustible quivers Arjuna could not defeat petty bandits. So this actually proves that Arjuna was no superior even with ordinary arrows. Yes his bow gandiva was superior hence he did get some results like virat yuddha.
    Asking question what these divyastra wielding maharathis could do to Arjuna Ans Making arjuna feel inferior. What arjuna could do to divysatras wielding maharathis. Ans Tickle their funny bone.

  24. Smarty, I did not say that Arjuna never used divyastra. But he did not relied heavly on divyastras like Kaurava Maharathis. Karna started divyastra fight on 17th day. Arjuna only retaliated. He defeated Bhishma, Drona, Karna and Ashvatthama with normal arrows.

    Abhimanyu was not a flop hero. He forced Maharathis like Karna and Ashvatthama to turn back from the battle. He defeated Duhsasana and Karna’s son Vrishsena and killed Duryo’s son Lakshmana in front of all Kauravas. He also killed Shalya’s brother Shala that day. Abhimanyu had defeated Ashvatthama, Shalya, Jayadratha, Kritaverma etc even before the battle of 13th day. These were not ordinary achievements.

  25. Arjuna vs Karna +Drona +Duryodhana+ Shakuni

    “Sanjaya continued, ‘Thus urged by Bhima and Kesava, Savyasachin prevailing over Drona and Karna, began to resist the foe all round. Many foremost of Kshatriyas (among the Kurus), putting forth all their prowess, failed to withstand Arjuna who advanced at the very van of his troops, and who, like a raging conflagration, was consuming the foremost ones among his foes. Then Duryodhana and Karna, and Sakuni, the son of Suvala, covered Kunti’s son, Dhananjaya, with showers of shafts. Baffling the weapons of all those warriors, that foremost of all persons well-skilled in weapons, O monarch, covered them (in return) with his shafts. Aiming at their weapons with his (and thus baffling them all), Arjuna, endued with great lightness of hand and possessing a complete control over his senses, pierced every one of those warriors with ten keen-pointed shafts. The welkin was then covered with dust. Thick showers of arrows fell. Darkness set in, and a loud and terrible uproar arose. When such was the state of things, neither the welkin, nor the earth, nor the points of the compass, could any longer be seen. Stupefied by the dust, all the troops became blind. Neither the foe, O king, nor we, could distinguish each other. For this reason, the kings began to fight, guided by conjecture and the names they uttered. Deprived of their cars, car-warriors, O king, encountering one another, lost all order and became a tangled mass. Their steeds killed and drivers slain, many of them, becoming inactive, preserved their lives and looked exceedingly affrighted. Slain steeds with riders deprived of lives were seen to lie on slain elephants as if stretched on mountain-breasts. Then Drona, moving away from that battle towards the north took up his station there.,….”

    Arjuna defeated all of them. Drona moved away from that front. Again when Dristidyumna protected by Satyaki killed Drona, Arjuna held Karna & co. in check.

  26. isn’t it funny Anand we don’t know when MB exactly happened but are fighting like stupids picking out interpolation. we don’t even know the characters ever existed or not like the celestial weapons.

    even if Kauravas actually won the fight than also we cannot know . there is no evidence only one book by person who claimed himself to be GOD.

    at least theirs should be more ten books on such historical event written by various authors or historians.

    who cant even know if Kauravas fought with lesser army than Pandavas .